… I was a geek and I liked it (in best Katy Perry voice).
I’m no ‘techspert’, but faced with the option of buying a new Apple Mac Pro system or upgrading my current can of chips to make the most of Blackmagic Design’s Davinci Resolve software. After comparing budgets, £2800 plus versus £700, the upgrade won.
Arts and media creatives are becoming ever reliant on technology, either to produce their work or distribute it. The myriad of apps and software they use with ever increasing complexity requires equally intricate hardware that comes at significant cost. To keep budgets under control many are learning the ways of ‘the geek’.
An online search revealed my current 4.1 Intel based system, released in 2009, could have an upgrade using an Accelsior PCIe solid state drive (SSD), some more memory (ram), USB3 slots (Macs only started shipping with this from 2013) and a graphics card. All fairly standard, but, this would not increase my machine’s performance sufficiently. With a 5.1 system, like that released in 2010, upgrade options increase.
Much to my surprise a firmware utility change could achieve this for my machine. Apparently the same motherboard architecture was used on both models and it was just a matter of telling the older sibling you have the same genes. Installing the files and locating relevant “packages” (Mac app installation folders) involved a little more dark science. I tried this reversible modification before any of the bits I ordered above arrived. The successful change to 5.1 indicated a noticeable difference in stability and speed to my OSX 10.10 (Yosemite) set up. I also gained confidence to tackle further changes!
I ordered a 6 core 3.33GHz processor from Mac-Factory in Germany who specialise in mac parts. Installing this chip was fairly straightforward. Here’s one of the many installation instructions available.
Mac Upgrade Comparison
I’ve learned a few lessons ofcourse. I purchased RAM (32GB 1066mhz) for the 4.1 model too early, only to realise later I could have had optimum performance from 5.1 spec’d 1333mhz memory. Had I only read about that firmware utility sooner! I’ll consider a return and exchange with the guys at OWC. I’m also using a 1GB Radeon graphics card due to be replaced with a used 3GB GPU that cost £125. I’ve since learned that Nvidia GPUs are a better option due to their Cuda acceleration driver. The reason I opted for a budget used card was to enable 4k monitor use in the short term until further funds allow the preferred option. I aim to get the Nvidia GTX 980ti 6GB or better at a later date. Modern GPUs boost processing speed significantly. This is where many 5.1 systems may continue to have some life yet and even rival the latest 6.1 incarnations.
Here are three separate benchmark tests I conducted in 64bit mode on my machine after the upgrade which confirm the speed levels expected can be attained, even with below spec memory.
And so the adventure was indeed worth it. Not only from a budget perspective but the knowledge I gained through research and hands on practice. A six year old computer has been stimulated for a few more years service. Until now, except for OSX upgrades and replacing full HDDs, I had only ever added 16GB ram and the 1GB GPU.
The greatest respect must be given to all the dedicated independent techies who invest time, experiment with their machines and share knowledge which guides many like me on such quests. Whilst a lot more personal development is required before I even consider diploma, let alone degree, I’ve got my geek certificate of attendance for the day and I’m proud of the achievement!